Human data exists, but no mitochondrial intervention has a healthy-aging lifespan RCT. The human evidence here is functional (muscle/vascular), biomarker (NAD⁺, immune), or disease-outcome (CoQ10 mortality in heart failure; elamipretide approved for the rare disease Barth syndrome) — never a healthy-aging lifespan trial. "Improves a biomarker in a trial" ≠ "extends healthy human lifespan," and "reduces mortality in heart failure" ≠ "anti-aging." Every page shows this plainly.

Interventions

Study records

Mechanisms

Evidence tiers

TierLabelNote
1Healthy-aging human lifespan RCTRandomized, hard lifespan/healthy-aging endpoint in a healthy-aging population. NONE exist for any mitochondrial intervention as of the search date — tier empty by design.
2Human clinical-outcome RCT — disease populationRandomized, hard clinical outcome (e.g. mortality) but in a disease population, not healthy aging. Example: Q-SYMBIO CoQ10 mortality in chronic heart failure.
3Human RCT — functional endpointRandomized, endpoint is a physical-function measure (muscle strength/endurance, VO2, vascular/endothelial function), not lifespan.
4Human RCT — biomarker endpointRandomized, endpoint is a biomarker (NAD+, blood pressure, arterial stiffness, immune or gene-expression markers, lipids/glucose).
5Human observational / mechanisticCohort, cross-sectional, or ex-vivo human tissue; no randomized intervention.
6Animal healthspan / lifespan studyLifespan or healthspan/function change in an animal or invertebrate model (e.g. urolithin A in C. elegans and rodents).
7In vitro / mechanismCell-culture or biochemical mechanism; no whole-organism outcome.